Protip: Minimum settings may NOT give you maximum performance.

I did some testing today, unfortunately I did not think to provide screenshots.

I used MSI Afterburner to chart GPU % USAGE.

I used Task Manager to monitor CPU % USAGE.

The following is what I considered 'low settings', set for intended maximum performance.

1600 x 900, with the lowest settings across every graphics settings.

So what did I find?

My GPU % Usage was hovering at 35%. Completely underutilized.

My CPU % Usage was spread across all cores/thread. 7/8 threads were about 30-50%, but the main working thread was maxing out between 95-100%. Despite being at 100% usage, it didn't seem to present any performance issues or stuttering however. Anyway, completely overstressed.

So what changes did I settle on?

1920×1080,

AA – Ultra

PP – High

Shadows- High

Texture- Ultra

Efffects – High

Foliage – Very Low

View Distance -Very Low

My GPU % USAGE after : 80-95%

My CPU % USAGE after : 70-90%

I fiddled with these settings for over 2 hours to reach these.

I settled on settings that alleviated much stress off of my CPU usage, while simultaneously NOT maxing out my GPU usage.

Conclusion. Do your own optimization and don't assume the lowest settings are giving you the best performance. It is true what they say, that lowering the graphics settings is just putting more work on your CPU.

P.S. I noticed that the 'Screen Scaling' setting would send GPU usage through the roof. Setting it to 120 can easily add 30% GPU usage over the default 100 setting.


Original post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.